This website requires JavaScript.
DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.18.23290204

A Simple Score to Predict New-onset Atrial Fibrillation After Ablation of Typical Atrial Flutter

Z.Gu J. Jiao X. Ding ...+8 M. Chen
摘要
Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NeAF) is common after cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent counterclockwise atrial flutter (CCW-AFL) ablation. This study aimed to investigate a simple predictive model of NeAF after CCW-AFL ablation. Methods and Results: From January 2013 to December 2017, consecutive patients receiving CCW-AFL ablation were enrolled from three centers. Clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic data were collected and followed. Patients from two centers and another center were assigned into the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. In the derivation cohort, logistic regression was performed to evaluate the ability of parameters to discriminate those with and without NeAF. A score system was developed and then validated. Two hundred seventy-one patients (mean 59.7{+/-}13.6 age; 205 male) were analyzed. During follow-up (73.0{+/-}6.5 months), 107 patients (39.5%) had NeAF. 190 and 81 patients were detected in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Hypertension, age [&ge;]70 years, left atrial diameter [&ge;]42 mm, P wave duration [&ge;]120 ms and the negative component of flutter wave in lead II [&ge;]120 ms were selected as the final parameters. A weighted score was used to develop the HAD-AF score ranging from 0 to 9. In the derivation cohort, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.938 (95% CI 0.902-0.974), superior to those of currently used CHA2DS2-VASC (0.679, 95% CI 0.600-0.757) and HATCH scores (0.651, 95% CI 0.571-0.730) (P<0.001). Performance maintained in the validation cohort. Conclusions: 39.5% of patients developed NeAF in 6 years after CCW-AFL ablation. HAD-AF score can reliably identify patients likely to develop NeAF after CCW-AFL ablation.
展开全部
图表提取

暂无人提供速读十问回答

论文十问由沈向洋博士提出,鼓励大家带着这十个问题去阅读论文,用有用的信息构建认知模型。写出自己的十问回答,还有机会在当前页面展示哦。

Q1论文试图解决什么问题?
Q2这是否是一个新的问题?
Q3这篇文章要验证一个什么科学假设?
0
被引用
笔记
问答