This website requires JavaScript.
DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.21.23290310

ECG predictors of AF: a systematic review (Predicting AF in Ischaemic Stroke-PrAFIS)

A.Berry-Noronha L. Bonavia E. Song ...+4 R. Sahathevan
摘要
In 25% of patients presenting with embolic stroke, a cause is not determined. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a commonly identified mechanism of stroke in this population, particularly in older patients. Conventional investigations are used to detect AF, but can we predict AF in this population and generally? We performed a systematic review to identify potential predictors of AF on 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG).<break><break> Method: We conducted a search of EMBASE and Medline databases for prospective and retrospective cohorts, meta-analyses or case-control studies of ECG abnormalities in sinus rhythm predicting subsequent atrial fibrillation. We assessed quality of studies based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and data were extracted according to PRISMA guidelines.<break><break> Results: We identified 42 studies based on our criteria. ECG patterns that predicted the risk of developing AF included interatrial block, P-wave terminal force lead V1, P-wave dispersion, abnormal P-wave-axis, abnormal P-wave amplitude, prolonged PR interval, left ventricular hypertrophy, QT prolongation, ST-T segment abnormalities and atrial premature beats. Furthermore, we identified that factors such as increased age, high CHADS-VASC, chronic renal disease further increase the positive-predictive value of some of these parameters. Several of these have been successfully incorporated into clinical scoring systems to predict AF.<break><break>Conclusion: There are several ECG abnormalities that can predict AF both independently, and with improved predictive value when combined with clinical risk factors, and if incorporated into clinical risk scores. Improved and validated predictive models could streamline selection of patients for cardiac monitoring and initiation of oral anticoagulants.
展开全部
图表提取

暂无人提供速读十问回答

论文十问由沈向洋博士提出，鼓励大家带着这十个问题去阅读论文，用有用的信息构建认知模型。写出自己的十问回答，还有机会在当前页面展示哦。

Q1论文试图解决什么问题？
Q2这是否是一个新的问题？
Q3这篇文章要验证一个什么科学假设？
0
被引用
0
笔记
0
问答