This website requires JavaScript.

# High-productivity, high-performance workflow for virus-scale electrostatic simulations with Bempp-Exafmm.

Cornell University - arXiv
Mar 2021

Biomolecular electrostatics is key in protein function and the chemical processes affecting it.Implicit-solvent models expressed by the Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) equation can provide insights with less computational power than full atomistic models, making large-system studies -- at the scale of viruses, for example -- accessible to more researchers. This paper presents a high-productivity and high-performance computational workflow combining Exafmm, a fast multipole method (FMM) library, and Bempp, a Galerkin boundary element method (BEM) package. It integrates an easy-to-use Python interface with well-optimized computational kernels that are written in compiled languages. Researchers can run PB simulations interactively via Jupyter notebooks, enabling faster prototyping and analyzing. We provide results that showcase the capability of the software, confirm correctness, and evaluate its performance with problem sizes between 8,000 and 2 million boundary elements. A study comparing two variants of the boundary integral formulation in regards to algebraic conditioning showcases the power of this interactive computing platform to give useful answers with just a few lines of code. As a form of solution verification, mesh refinement studies with a spherical geometry as well as with a real biological structure (5PTI) confirm convergence at the expected $1/N$ rate, for $N$ boundary elements. Performance results include timings, breakdowns, and computational complexity. Exafmm offers evaluation speeds of just a few seconds for tens of millions of points, and $\mathcal{O}(N)$ scaling. This allowed computing the solvation free energy of a Zika virus, represented by 1.6 million atoms and 10 million boundary elements, at 80-min runtime on a single compute node (dual 20-core Intel Xeon Gold 6148). All results in the paper are presented with utmost care for reproducibility.

Q1论文试图解决什么问题？
Q2这是否是一个新的问题？
Q3这篇文章要验证一个什么科学假设？